
FDA IVD Testing & Validation Services
End-to-End Support for FDA Diagnostic Assay Submissions
We provide comprehensive analytical and clinical testing services to support FDA diagnostic (IVD) submissions, including 510(k), De Novo, PMA, EUA, and CLIA Waiver pathways. Our studies are designed to meet FDA and CLSI expectations and generate submission-ready data you can rely on.
FDA IVD Testing & Validation Service
End-to-End Support for FDA Diagnostic Assay Submissions
We provide comprehensive analytical and clinical testing services to support FDA diagnostic (IVD) submissions, including 510(k), De Novo, PMA, EUA, and CLIA Waiver pathways. Our studies are designed to meet FDA and CLSI expectations and generate submission-ready data you can rely on.
Our Expertise
Leveraging the power of genomics, cell biology, microbiology, immunoassays, and other advanced technologies, Avance Biosciences has extensive experience supporting clients with testing and validation of diagnostic assays and companion diagnostics for their IVD submissions. Our comprehensive approach ensures precise, reliable, and clinically relevant results, facilitating the generation of FDA-ready data packages, clear traceability from requirements to results, and a more efficient regulatory review process.
End-to-End Support for FDA Diagnostic Assay Submissions

Assay Types We Support
Assay Type
Benchtop Testing
Analytical Performance
Clinical Performance
Point of Care (POC)
Molecular
(PCR/NGS)




Immunoassays
(ELISA/LFA)




Clinical Chemistry
(LC-MS/MS)



Regulatory Pathways We Support
FDA Submission Pathway
Description
Testing Required
510(k) Premarket Notification
For assays with a predicate device
We design and execute analytical and clinical performance studies to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate.
- Predicate comparison strategies
- Full analytical performance testing
- Clinical performance studies (when required)
- Submission-ready reports
De Novo Classification
For novel assays with no predicate
We support first-of-a-kind diagnostics by generating the data needed to establish a new Class I or II device classification.
- Risk-based study design
- Analytical and clinical validation
- Data supporting special controls
- Future 510(k) predicate positioning
Premarket Approval (PMA)
For high-risk diagnostic assays
Our PMA-grade testing programs generate the independent evidence required to demonstrate safety and effectiveness.
- Comprehensive analytical validation
- Clinical performance studies
- IDE support (as applicable)
- PMA-level documentation and traceability
Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)
For declared public health emergencies
We deliver accelerated analytical and clinical studies aligned with FDA emergency expectations.
- LoD and analytical sensitivity
- Inclusivity and cross-reactivity
- Rapid protocol development
- Emergency-aligned reporting
CLIA Waiver by Application
For point-of-care and home-use tests
We design studies demonstrating that your assay is simple to use and has a low risk of erroneous results.
- Flex studies
- Dual CLIA + 510(k)/De Novo support
Our IVD Testing Services
Service
Description
Testing Required
Analytical Performance
- Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ)
- Accuracy and method comparison
- Precision (repeatability, intermediate precision, reproducibility)
- Linearity and measuring range
- Analytical specificity (cross-reactivity, interference, carryover)
Benchtop Testing
Sample & Matrix Studies
- Matrix equivalency (serum, plasma, whole blood)
- Sample type validation
- Stability (real-time, freeze–thaw, transport conditions)
Reagent & System Robustness
- Real-time and accelerated stability
- Open-vial and on-instrument stability
- Environmental stress testing
- Operator variability simulations
Analytical Performance Protocols
FDA-ready protocols designed to withstand regulatory review.
- Study design and statistical analysis plans
- CLSI and FDA guidance alignment
- Predicate and reference method strategy
- Pre-submission protocol support
- Deviation management and justification
Clinical Performance Studies
Clinical evidence demonstrating how your assay performs in real-world patient populations.
- Clinical sensitivity and specificity
- Comparator method alignment
- Patient sample testing
- Multi-site study coordination
- IDE support when required
Quality Assurance
- Rigorous quality control processes (GLP/CLIA) to ensure the highest standards of data integrity and reproducibility for your IVD submission.
- Adherence to FDA, CLSI, and international regulatory expectations for IVD development and validation.
- Regulatory compliance and certifications: 21 CFR–compliant operations, FDA registered and inspected facilities, and CLIA-registered testing services.
FAQs
We provide end-to-end analytical and clinical testing to support FDA diagnostic submissions, including benchtop testing, analytical performance studies, clinical performance studies, and point-of-care testing, across genomics, cell biology, microbiology, immunoassays, and other advanced technologies. We also support companion diagnostics.
510(k) Premarket Notification (for assays with a predicate device), De Novo classification (for novel assays with no predicate), Premarket Approval (for high-risk diagnostic assays), Emergency Use Authorization (for declared public health emergencies), and CLIA Waiver by Application (for point-of-care and home-use tests).
Limit of detection and limit of quantitation; accuracy and method comparison; precision (repeatability, intermediate precision, and reproducibility); linearity and measuring range; and analytical specificity, including cross-reactivity, interference, and carryover.
Molecular assays (PCR and NGS), immunoassays (ELISA and lateral flow), and clinical chemistry assays (LC-MS/MS). Molecular assays and immunoassays can be supported through benchtop, analytical performance, clinical performance, and point-of-care testing. Clinical chemistry assays are supported through benchtop, analytical performance, and clinical performance testing.
Yes: matrix equivalency (serum, plasma, whole blood), sample type validation, and sample stability under real-time, freeze–thaw, and transport conditions.
Yes: real-time and accelerated stability, open-vial stability, environmental stress, and operator variability studies.
Yes: clinical sensitivity and specificity, comparator method alignment, patient sample testing, multi-site study coordination, and IDE support.
Our operations are 21 CFR-compliant, our facility is FDA-registered and inspected, our testing services are CLIA-registered, and we work to CLSI standards and FDA expectations under GLP/CGMP operations.
FDA reviews the data package, not who ran it, but it expects the study to be scientifically sound and traceable. FDA’s IVD study guidance asks for a protocol with objectives and performance goals tied to your claims, a pre-specified statistical analysis plan, records that preserve raw measurements and specimen traceability, and a primary analysis that includes all observations rather than excluding outliers after the fact.
The pathway depends on your intended use, the analyte, the specimen type, who will run the test, and whether a predicate exists. A 510(k) is built on showing substantial equivalence to a predicate, with analytical performance (bias, imprecision, sensitivity, specificity) as the core of the review. De Novo applies when there is no predicate and general controls are enough to assure safety and effectiveness. PMA applies to the highest-risk tests. Because the wrong pathway assumption can invalidate a study plan, we start from your intended use and design the study package to match the pathway you and FDA settle on.
Analytical studies for IVDs are typically designed around the relevant CLSI evaluation protocols, for example for precision, linearity, detection capability, interference, and method comparison, and FDA recognizes CLSI standards for sensitivity and specificity estimation. We design each study to the CLSI protocol that matches the performance claim, including the number of runs, replicates, days, lots, and operators needed to support it, and we will tell you up front if your proposed claim needs a larger study than you budgeted.
Clinical performance claims need specimens from a representative sample of the intended-use population, though enriched, credentialed, or spiked samples are acceptable for rare conditions or to challenge cut-offs, as long as the performance estimate still reflects real-world use. Because IVD studies using human specimens are human-subject research, informed consent and IRB review (21 CFR Parts 50 and 56) apply, though FDA exercises enforcement discretion for certain studies using non-identifiable leftover specimens. We work with you to define a specimen plan that matches your intended use before testing begins.
We coordinate multi-site studies, align results to the comparator method, and test patient samples under a single protocol so that site-to-site variation is something you can analyze rather than discover afterward. FDA’s guidance is explicit that a sponsor’s own lab counts as a study site and is subject to the same investigational plan and bioresearch monitoring inspection as independent sites, so we plan documentation and traceability on the assumption that an inspector may ask to see it. We also support IDE needs where your study is not exempt, for example when the test result will guide treatment decisions and no medically established diagnostic is available to confirm it.
A companion diagnostic provides information that is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding therapeutic product, so its validation is tied to the therapy’s development timeline and clinical trial rather than a standalone product launch. Practically, that means locking the assay’s intended use and performance targets early, planning clinical specimen bridging between trial samples and the final assay, and keeping analytical validation moving in parallel with the clinical program. We support companion diagnostic testing and validation across molecular, immunoassay, and clinical chemistry platforms.
Before the first scoping call, it helps to have your intended-use statement (analyte, specimen type, patient population, user setting), your target claims (for example, the LoD and clinical sensitivity/specificity you want to state), your predicate or comparator if you have one, and whether your sample types and matrices are fixed. We recommend engaging before you finalize your protocol, since sample size, number of lots and operators, and specimen sourcing are the biggest drivers of study cost and timeline, and they are far cheaper to change on paper than after the study has started. FDA’s own process encourages early engagement for novel technology and complex studies for the same reason.
Regulatory Guidance
FDA plays a critical role in protecting the United States from threats such as emerging infectious diseases and public health emergencies. This draft guidance describes general recommendations for the validation of in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs) for emerging pathogens during an applicable declaration under section 564 of the Federal Food,...
This guidance outlines FDA's current thinking on key aspects of the 510(k) Third Party Review Program and third party review of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) requests by describing FDA's expectations for the review of 510(k) submissions and EUA requests by third party review organizations. This guidance provides updated recommendations on...
Center for Devices and Radiological Health FDA is issuing this guidance to announce and describe FDA’s voluntary pilot program for certain Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)-regulated oncology drug products used with certain in vitro diagnostic tests....